Wednesday, August 15, 2007

The legal jihad

This is an article by Phillis Chesler in the Front Page Magazine:



When will the West awaken? Of course, I am not talking about your ordinary citizen or soldier but about our Talking Heads and other gate-keeping chatterers who simply refuse to "get it."


Cambridge University Press not only recalls but has promised to pulp the book that authoritatively documents one Saudi billionaire's funding of terror; many anti-jihadic writers and all our leading mainstream media have privately apologized to this same billionaire. Only Rachel Ehrenfeld has refused to "apologize" for telling the truth and has counter-sued him in an American court of law based on her First Amendment right to tell the truth. (She was initially sued in London where she lost by default; she chose not to appear in court).


At a recent conference in Los Angeles, sponsored by the American Freedom Alliance, Daniel Pipes announced his intention to start a legal defense bail fund for those who are sued by Islamists and their Western apologists for telling the truth. Not a moment too soon--although, regrettably, perhaps too late for Ehrenfeld. And, The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has begun a process of legal intimidation against my esteemed colleague, Robert Spencer. Accordingly, David Horowitz has launched a legal defense fund for Spencer. I have pledged money to this and advise us all to do the same.


Before this war is over, we will each need legal defense funds. And that's if we're lucky. Those in the Islamic East need bodyguards and air-lifts to safety in the West. But there is a pattern emerging in the West which we ignore at our own peril.



Of course, read it all.  Here is a scary thought.  Consider the stories about public school madrassa in New York, Carver Elementary School in San Diego, Foot-Washing Basins for Muslim Students, Sharia in Britain etc.  Can you imagine any of this prior to 9/11?  It is scary, because it seems that Al-Qaeda succeeded beyond its wildest dreams.  Even as our soldiers are chasing down the violent Islamists, our public officials are cowering in front of the Islamist front organizations like CAIR.  As long as political correctness exists, the bastards are very skillful in using our laws against us.  We need leaders who will shed any pretence of political correctness, and fast.  We need to stand up to this legal jihad and say: "Enough is enough".  And by the way, for once I would support litigation.  For example, suing Carver Elementary would be the right thing to do.  For once, let's use our laws and political correctness to our advantage.


Powered by Qumana


Tuesday, August 14, 2007

The US military is more successful in Iraq than the world wants to believe

That was the caption under the photograph in the Spiegel article (via Bill's Bites):



When describing Iraq, the word "peace" is seldom used. Truth be told, the Americans have restored order to many parts of the county. But Iraq remains fractured, and where new schools are built today, bombs could explode tomorrow.








The "Hands of Victory" in Baghdad's Green Zone: The US military is more successful in Iraq than the world wants to believe.



DER SPIEGEL / Agentur Focus / Tina Hager





The "Hands of Victory" in Baghdad's Green Zone: The US military is more successful in Iraq than the world wants to believe.






The Iraq war came within a hair of returning to Ramadi in early July. The attackers had already gathered four kilometers (about 2.5 miles) south of the city, on the banks of the Nasr canal. Between 40 and 50 men dressed in light uniforms were armed like soldiers and prepared to commit a series of suicide bombings. They had already strapped explosive vests to their bodies and loaded thousands of kilograms of explosives, missiles and grenades onto two old Mercedes trucks. But their plan was foiled when Iraqis intent on preserving peace in Ramadi betrayed them to the Americans (emphasis mine - Eric-Odessit).


Read it all.


Powered by Qumana


Important development

Fox News reports:



The United States will soon be referring to an Iranian military division as a “specially designated global terrorist,” the Washington Post reported Tuesday.


Under Executive Order 13224, which President George W. Bush signed two weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps would be targeted in probes of terrorism financing, the Post reported.


Click here to read the Washington Post story.


The Bush administration has been debating whether to target the Revolutionary Guard Corps in full, or only its Quds Force wing, which U.S. officials have linked to the growing flow of explosives, roadside bombs, rockets and other arms to Shiite militias in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan, the Post reported.


The Revolutionary Guard boasts such veterans as Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and many Iranian business leaders.



I would question the wisdom of revealing this information.  Of course, once Washington Post published it, there is no more reason to hide it.  On the other hand, maybe our counter-terrorism expert find it useful to keep the Iranians on their toes, and leaked it deliberately.  In any case, let's hope that this will help the war effort.


powered by Qumana


Saturday, August 11, 2007

Lessons of History

Today I received an e-mail from my friend George Mellinger of Veteran-American Voices, an author and historian.  His e-mail contained the links to 2 documentaries about Vietnam War, attempting to correct the misconceptions about that war and explain the role of the media during that war.  Apparently they are being posted on YouTube in pieces and also available for download in full.


The first documentary is called "Vietnam War - The Real Story":





Full 1-hour version is available for download here.


The second one is called "Vietnam War - The Impact of Media":





Full 1-hour version is available for download here.


So, why is the history of Vietnam War important now?  Because then, as now, our enemies used our Left and our leftist-dominated media to defeat us.  We need to learn from history in order to prevent this from happening again.  In conclusion, let me quote a journalist who participated in these documentaries, Robert Elegant.  He wrote an article entitled "How to lose a war".  Obviously, I highly recommend reading the whole thing.  The article is full of "money" quotes.  But here is the conclusion:



...As long as the "Viet Nam Syndrome" afflicts the media, it seems to me that it will be virtually impossible for the West to conduct an effective foreign policy. It is apparently irrelevant that the expectations of paradise after Hanoi's victory evoked by "the critics of the American war" became the purgatory the Indochinese people have suffered. Just as many denizens of the antebellum American South did not know that "Damyankee" was really two words, an entire generation in Europe and the United States behaves as if "the dirty, immoral war in Viet Nam" were an irrefutable and inseparable dogma. Merely equate El Salvador (or any other American intervention) to Viet Nam — and not only the American public but all "liberal" Europeans will condemn it without reservation. That is all they need to know. In its final effect — what has over the last decade been called "the paralysis of political will "— it will make it especially difficult for the United States to honor any political commitment anywhere in the world where small and threatened nations may expect American support for their independent existence. Before they fall to an aggressor, they will have been victimized by "the Viet Nam Syndrome."


It has long appeared to me that the medical and legal professions enjoy one enormous advantage. If they err, doctors and lawyers may be blamed. Yet, except in the most flagrant cases, the client or the patient pays them again for correcting their mistakes — if they can, and if he can. But the media on Viet Nam, it has become blatantly obvious, have enjoyed even greater advantages. Even in the most flagrant cases, they have not been blamed. They have, rather, been acclaimed for their errors. Who can, ultimately, prove it otherwise? The peoples of the non-Communist world have paid dearly for these errors — and may well continue to pay.



Let's just hope that we can defeat that "Viet Nam Syndrome".


Powered by Qumana


Friday, August 10, 2007

Carnival of the Liberals - on-line Protest Warrior action

A couple of days ago I received an invitation to participate in the Carnival of San Diego bloggers.  I've never heard of such a thing as a Blog Carnival.  Turns out, a blog carnival is a collection of articles from a bunch of participating blogs.  It is not a bad idea: it allows you to essentially advertise your blog.  Well, the requirement for the San Diego Blog Carnival was that an article has to have an emphasis on local coverage within the last month.  I did not have anything specific to San Diego in the last month, so I did not have anything to submit to this particular carnival.  However, there are many other blog carnivals.  Interestingly, one of the is called "Carnival of the Liberals".  Well, well, well, I consider myself a Liberal in the original sense of the word.  Thus, I should be able to participate, right?  So, in the finest tradition of Protest Warrior, I submitted my original "Reclaiming the Terms" article to the Carnival of the Liberals.  Supposedly it will be hosted at the blog called "Neural Gourmet".  The date it should be published is August 15.  Let's see what kind of reaction I will get from the Left.


Powered by Qumana


Monday, August 6, 2007

The Ultimate Jew

This Jackie Mason video is via Hot Air:





Powered by Qumana


Sunday, August 5, 2007

We are under attack

This is via LGF:



Goose Creek - Two men are being held in the Berkeley County Detention Center after police find explosive making devices in their car. The quantity of explosive making materials in that vehicle is unclear. The FBI (website) reports that there is no known link to terrorism. The Berkeley County Sheriff's Office believes that among materials in the car's trunk were a bomb and bomb making materials that include chemicals, fuses, and igniters. The men 21-year-old Yousef Megahed and 24-year-old Ahmed Mohamed were pulled over Saturday evening during a routine traffic stop near Myers Road and Highway 176. Few details about the suspects are known at this time. They are believed to be students at a Florida college. They are of Middle Eastern descent and are not US citizens. Neither man has been charged, but charges are expected Monday. A press conference will be held in Berkeley County on Monday morning. Possession of unlawful explosives is among the potential charges. Officials are not at this time releasing any additional information. The Berkeley County Sheriff's office may confirm what exactly was found in that trunk during Monday's press conference. Stay tuned to ABC News 4 and www.abcnews4.com for details as they become available.



So, here we have young Middle-Eastern men fitting certain profile with explosives.  Am I profiling them unfairly?  Could it be that the explosives make a large contribution to that profile?


Powered by Qumana


Land mines in Canada

This is a disturbing story (via Atlas):



The big question about two live landmines found in a countryside culvert running under Inadale Drive between Strathroy and Mt. Brydges, Ontario yesterday is who put them there?


Appearing to be attached to timers, the landmines were likely of the type used to blow up tanks, according to Strathroy-Caradoc police.


Police yesterday swarmed a country creek where children cool off in heat waves like the one this week as Canadian Forces explosives experts detonated the landmines.


The creek would be a huge draw for children in the weatherman’s extreme heat alert on Ontario’s Simcoe Day long weekend.


“One mine was discovered by two teenaged girls Friday. They called police, and a second mine was found yesterday morning, only one metre away from the first.” (London Free Press, (London, Ontario) and Sun Media, August 5, 2007



I wonder what my Canadian cousins would have to say about this.


Powered by Qumana


Mark Stein's article

Here is an important article by Mark Stein, thanks to Atlas:



How will we lose the war against "radical Islam"?


Well, it won't be in a tank battle. Or in the Sunni Triangle or the caves of Bora Bora. It won't be because terrorists fly three jets into the Oval Office, Buckingham Palace and the Basilica of St Peter's on the same Tuesday morning.


The war will be lost incrementally because we are unable to reverse the ongoing radicalization of Muslim populations in South Asia, Indonesia, the Balkans, Western Europe and, yes, North America. And who's behind that radicalization? Who funds the mosques and Islamic centers that in the past 30 years have set up shop on just about every Main Street around the planet?



Obviously, read it all.


Powered by Qumana


Saturday, August 4, 2007

Reclaiming the Terms, Part 2: Immigrant

The immigration issues have not been in the news lately.  But they will come back eventually.  They always come back, until the issue will be resolved to everyone's satisfaction.  Thus, even though I got to this issue only now, it is useful to touch upon.  This is a continuation of an idea that started this blog: a desire to reclaim the terminology of the English language.  The large part of the following first appeared as a comment and then on front page of Bill Faith's original blog.  I'd like to have this all on my blog as well.


To start with, as in the first part of "Reclaiming the Terms" series, let's consult Merriam-Webster:


immigrant:


one that immigrates: as a: a person who comes to a country to take up permanent residence b: a plant or animal that becomes established in an area where it was previously unknown
— immigrant adjective


However, in my view this definition omits a uniquely American meaning of the word "immigrant": someone who comes to a new country, learns the language of a new country, which is English in the case of USA, assimilate and become part of the new country.  I personally resent when people marching and waving other country's flags are called "immigrants" to this country. That is because I am myself a naturalized American, i. e. an immigrant.  Those people waving Mexican flags and, as they say in Russian, pumping their right (kachat' prava), are not immigrants.  They are unassimilated migrants at best, and foreign invaders at worst, their legal status notwithstanding.  Thus, we come to the core of the problem as I see it.  The problem, in my opinion, is not "illegal immigration", as it is commonly called.  The problem is unassimilated migration.  The legal status of those migrants is absolutely irrelevant.  I bet the majority of those people participating in so-called pro-immigrant demonstrations were in fact legal residents or citizens, many of them perhaps born and raised in this country.  If you were illegal, would you risk attracting attention to yourself by going to such demonstration?  Yet they cannot be called "Americans".  As a country, we failed to assimilate certain segment of newcomers. We did it by allowing the Left to declare them a protected minority and pander to them.  Why do we keep hearing that if you speak Spanish, you'll get a better job?  Better job doing what?  Selling tacos in San Isidro?  Every time I go to a polling place, there are ballots available in Spanish. Don't you have to speak English in order to cast an informed vote?  I am always tempted to demand a ballot in Russian.  I actually did it once, just for laughs.  The people at the polling place explained to me that there are not enough Russian-speaking immigrants, but if I want ballots in Russian, I need to write to San Diego Registrar of Voters and ask for them.  The worst part of it is that  had I demanded a ballot in Russian hard enough, I would probably get it. And that is really sad. And by the way, they do have ballots in Russian in Brighton Beach, which I resent just as much as the Spanish ballots.  I can understand older people not being able to learn English.  But people in their 20s and 30s?  My wife, as a nurse, had patients who were disappointed, to say the least, when she could not speak Spanish with them.  And they were themselves, or had family members who were young enough and have been in this country long enough to learn the language.  Yet, they never did.

The Left made it even worse.  They managed to brainwash the younger generation, whose parents came to this country to seek better life for their children, into hating this country.  The leftist teachers distorted history, and now these young people do not see themselves as Americans, but identify with some other group that was supposedly wronged by America.  Yet they were often born and raised in this country.  To further illustrate the irrelevance of the legal status to this much deeper problem, who would you prefer: one of those kids waving Mexican flags and dumping on this country, or someone who sneaked across the border at the age of, let's say, 17, and a year later, out of appreciation for America, using fake ID, enlisted into the Marine Corps and put his life on the line for this country?  I would definitely prefer such an "illegal" Marine.  In fact, I would give him US Citizenship.  This is just a hypothetical, but I think it illustrates the point.  And no, I am not excusing the illegal crossing of the border, I am just saying that it is irrelevant to the issue of loyalty and assimilation, which is much more important in the time of war.

So, now we have a problem.  There is a segment of the population that is not loyal, and often openly hostile to this country.  You can call them "5th column".  How can we solve it?  First of all, the bleeding has to be stopped.  The border has to be secured.  It does not necessarily mean a wall, but most definitely means some sort of border troops, similar to what the Soviets had.  National Guard can play this role.  There was never a wall around the Soviet Union.  But there was a ploughed strip of land all around, where the footsteps were always visible, and there were border military patrols.  The border was secure.  By the way, as a side note, the Russians have now illegal migration problem on the Chinese border.  This is not really new: back in the 60s and 70s the Chinese Government would send civilians across the border.  The border dispute there is probably about 150 years old and it did at times escalated into an open border warfare.  My dad once on a business trip ran into a guy who used to be a helicopter pilot for the Soviet Air Force.  He told my dad that they were taken to hospitals treating Soviet soldiers mutilated by the Chinese and then given assignments to strafe those Chinese attempting to cross the border and destroy border villages.  Back then it worked to stop the Chinese infiltration.  But I don't think they would do it now, so they do have a problem.

But back to our problem.  It is possible to secure the border.  Then the immigration process has to be streamlined. Ideally, the whole INS, or whatever it is called now, should be replaced, but this is just wishful thinking.  Any kind of guest worker program or work visas should be eliminated and replaced with just Green Cards.  So, for example, if some employer is willing to sponsor someone to come and work in this country, that person should get a Green Card instead of H1B Visa.  There should be strings attached: if that person does not state his or her desire to immigrate and become an American, the Green Card should not be given, and that person should not be allowed to come to this country.  Why?  Because the temporary condition for that person that prevents assimilation should be eliminated.  After 5 years, that person should be allowed and reminded to apply for Citizenship.  A year should be given for that.  Then another reminder should be sent, stating that if the Citizenship application is not filled up by the end of another year, that person will be deported and not allowed to come back ever, or for at least 10 years.  If that person is caught in the country illegally, the prison sentence should be extremely stiff, like 10 years.  You see, my idea is essentially that America should be for Americans, both old and new, native-born and naturalized.  Dual Citizenships could be allowed, but only with friendly countries.  The alliances come and go, so some friendly countries might become hostile.  Should that happen, those holding dual citizenship with those formerly friendly countries should be specifically asked at that time where their loyalties lie.  And if they choose that other country, they should be sent there.

So, if this is ever implemented, we will never have people who live here, but who will by definition never assimilate.  The only people living in the country would be either loyal Americans or those who are waiting to become loyal Americans.  So, what do we do with the people that are now illegally in the country?  Well, after the border is secure, and it is actually easier to come to this country legally, than illegally, those who are already here can be given an amnesty.  Why?  Because the only alternative to it is to round them up, men, women and children, including the kids who were born in this country, and throw them out.  Besides this being a logistical nightmare, I don't think any of us are going to like what we see, if this is done.  Thus, anything other than a complete legalization will still leave an unassimilated chunk of population.  Any other idea, like requiring people to go to a country of origin and apply for Green Cards will not work: they are already here, they do not have a lot of money, and anything they would have to do to go back would cause tremendous disruption to their lives.  Besides, even if we give them a promise that they will automatically get Green Cards in their country of origin, still they would not feel that they have any guarantees.  So, they would just stay, and the problem will never be solved.  And that is just because we don't want to reward their law-breaking of entering the country illegally.  Do we really want to keep a permanent 5th column in the country just for that?  The goal should be not just an orderly immigration, but also a thorough assimilation of immigrants, the way it was done 100 years ago.  So, what's left?  The criminal background check.  That is a joke.  You can only check criminal backgrounds of those who come from friendly Western countries, and there are not many of those.  (Mexico is not a friendly Western country. It might not be hostile, but it is also not Western.)  Instead, immigrants committing crimes should be designated as "foreign criminals", somewhat similar to spies.  Now, that of course should apply only to premeditated crimes, not DUIs.  They should be given extremely stiff sentences, like 20 years, and then deported.  Perhaps, this should even include naturalized citizens.  And citizens involved in Islamo-Fascist terrorism should be charged with treason.  The punishment for treason during wartime is death.

Thus, here is my solution to the current immigration problem. We can call it "America for Americans". It does not stop immigration, but demands that every single immigrant assimilates and becomes a loyal American. What do you think? Did I solve "unassimilated migration" problem?


Powered by Qumana


Friday, August 3, 2007

Intellectually honest "liberals"

Apparently, there are some intellectually honest "liberals".  The only reason the word "liberals" is in quotes here is because I believe that true liberalism is now found right of center, while the authors of the article I am about to link are on the Left.  Nevertheless, they seem to have enough intellectual honesty and integrity to write the article I heard about on the Dennis Prager Show, but only now got around to posting on it:



A War We Just Might Win






Washington


VIEWED from Iraq, where we just spent eight days meeting with American and Iraqi military and civilian personnel, the political debate in Washington is surreal. The Bush administration has over four years lost essentially all credibility. Yet now the administration’s critics, in part as a result, seem unaware of the significant changes taking place.


Here is the most important thing Americans need to understand: We are finally getting somewhere in Iraq, at least in military terms. As two analysts who have harshly criticized the Bush administration’s miserable handling of Iraq, we were surprised by the gains we saw and the potential to produce not necessarily “victory” but a sustainable stability that both we and the Iraqis could live with.


After the furnace-like heat, the first thing you notice when you land in Baghdad is the morale of our troops. In previous trips to Iraq we often found American troops angry and frustrated — many sensed they had the wrong strategy, were using the wrong tactics and were risking their lives in pursuit of an approach that could not work.


Today, morale is high. The soldiers and marines told us they feel that they now have a superb commander in Gen. David Petraeus; they are confident in his strategy, they see real results, and they feel now they have the numbers needed to make a real difference.


Everywhere, Army and Marine units were focused on securing the Iraqi population, working with Iraqi security units, creating new political and economic arrangements at the local level and providing basic services — electricity, fuel, clean water and sanitation — to the people. Yet in each place, operations had been appropriately tailored to the specific needs of the community. As a result, civilian fatality rates are down roughly a third since the surge began — though they remain very high, underscoring how much more still needs to be done.


In Ramadi, for example, we talked with an outstanding Marine captain whose company was living in harmony in a complex with a (largely Sunni) Iraqi police company and a (largely Shiite) Iraqi Army unit. He and his men had built an Arab-style living room, where he met with the local Sunni sheiks — all formerly allies of Al Qaeda and other jihadist groups — who were now competing to secure his friendship.




Incidentally, my friend's brother, who is an Army Major and was in Ramadi with his unit, told me the same story.  But anyway, read the whole article.  Meanwhile, here is the Democrats in Congress say (via LGF):



House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) said Monday that a strongly positive report on progress on Iraq by Army Gen. David Petraeus likely would split Democrats in the House and impede his party's efforts to press for a timetable to end the war.


…………………………………………………………………………….


Many Democrats have anticipated that, at best, Petraeus and U.S. ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker would present a mixed analysis of the success of the current troop surge strategy, given continued violence in Baghdad. But of late there have been signs that the commander of U.S. forces might be preparing something more generally positive. Clyburn said that would be "a real big problem for us."



That is very tricky position to be in that the Democrats find themselves in: whatever is good for the country is bad for them.


Powered by Qumana


Spirit of America

John, a fellow Protest Warrior and a blogger, forwarded this to me with request to publish it on my blog.  I am more than happy to do that.




“Dear Blog Community, Welcome to the first Spirit of America (SoA) monthly update. A new outreach program designed to keep the blogger community informed of the projects that we engage in. We are a non-profit organization dedicated to helping our troops make a difference in the war torn countries of Afghanistan, Iraq and the Horn of Africa. Spirit of America facilitates the donation of humanitarian supplies that our troops distribute to civilians in those strategic regions of the world. This assistance is vital towards the creation of jobs and the restoration of public services like education and medical care. Thank you to the blogger community for your support. Sincerely, Spirit of America” This Month’s Topics:




  • Help us reach out to our Military



  • A Special Iraqi School Project



  • Quick Response to Afghan Farmers Request



  • Women’s Burn Unit & Maternity



  • Join our Mailing List, pass it on



REACHING OUT For our first blogger update we would like to ask for your help in order to reach out to our military personnel serving in Spirit of America’s theatre of operations (especially in Ramadi where our forces have had some huge successes recently). Many front line troops are not aware of the services that we provide to help them assist civilians living in those critical regions that they serve in. We can help facilitate their outreach to these civilians. Such humanitarian aid is vital to advance the cause of freedom, democracy and peace. Quite often our military personnel have requests for goods like school and medical supplies, sewing machines, hand tools, watches, water barrels, clothing, soccer gear and toys. Since 2001 we have successfully completed many of these supply projects and urge our servicemen and women to contact us to see if we can help them make a difference. Email Us SPECIAL IRAQI SCHOOL PROJECT Would you say that four years is a long time? It’s a fair chunk of change, but it’s hardly an extreme amount of time unless it is spent under extreme circumstances. In the case of Staff Sergeant (SSG) Steven Gardner you can say that he has experienced more in the last four years than most people have in their entire lifetimes. SSG Gardner has served his country in war torn Iraq since April 2003!!! For almost the entire conflict that has reshaped our times he has been deployed in many different provinces of the country. Throughout this time SSG Gardner witnessed how a brutal insurgency has victimized the Iraqi people. In order to give the Iraqis an alternative message of hope SoA is undertaking a special project with SSG Gardner to help a local school in the northern Iraqi city of Habur Gate. This endeavor is being conducted in the true spirit of our service men and women. It is something that is not fully appreciated by the general public. Consider the fact that last year 807 schools serving 322,800 students nationwide were completed using American funding and supervised by our military forces. In addition projects like “The America-Iraq School Partners Program” and many others have been completed by SoA to bolster what our troops have accomplished. Despite all of that hard work, this new project is made special by some very unique circumstances. While many of the military personnel that work on humanitarian relief projects with SoA are very enthusiastic about these efforts, few can say that they have been serving continuously in Iraq for so long. As much as we are concerned about how our soldiers and their families will have to endure extended tours as much as 15 months long, SSG Gardner won’t be going home to his family until 2008. That will make his tour of duty five years long!!! And as if that isn’t enough, he wants to contribute even more to the people of Iraq.
“All of this started because of what I have seen and been through. I want to leave here knowing I came, I fought and I made a difference in someone’s life here. This area is safe or reasonably so. The people are good.” “The kids are great and the teaching staff try and make do with what they have but with funds and materials not available, they can only do so much. The school is set-up so that the kids attend from middle school through high school. The blackboards are a wreck. No fans or cooling systems in the classrooms. No computers. No sports equipment. There are no sports uniforms (they take a lot of pride in soccer). No art supplies to speak of. Basically, they need an overhaul.” There can be no better example of the quality of our men and women serving in Iraq than SSG Gardner. SoA is proud to support such an American patriot and friend to the Iraqi people. He doesn’t ask for glory or any form of undue attention, he only desires to help those in need. Please visit our project page to learn more. QUICK RESPONSE TO AFGHAN FARMERS REQUEST WOW!!! Due to your overwhelming show of support, this project is already well underway. Here is the Sergeant Major’s response when told that we had raised $13k in the first five hours: “I didn’t expect the project to be such a big hit. I am really pleasantly surprised that the project has raised so much already!”
SoA is also working to find the zargol type of saffron which prospers in Iraq. If you have information on where these bulbs can be found or would like to donate saffron bulbs for these farmers, please send an email to us with the subject: Saffron Bulbs for Afghanistan. The Sergeant Major says: “The amount of heroin that is produced from this country (about 90% of total world’s production) is unbelievable. Poppy fields stretch for miles. The Taliban use poppy grown in Afghanistan to generate funding for their activities... ...This region is where saffron originally came from, before cultivation spread to Europe. Right now Afghanistan’s neighbor in the west, Iran, grows the largest quantities of saffron, that it exports globally as the world’s most expensive spice by weight... ...I think that if it were more available, saffron would be grown here in greater quantities, taking cash away from the Taliban.” Please visit our project page to learn more. WOMEN’S BURN UNIT & MATERNITY After the rule of the Taliban and decades of war, Afghanistan’s healthcare system has been neglected. Equipment is in short supply and hospitals are in disrepair. Army Colonel Wendell Hickman in cooperation with attorney Melinda Lord seeks your help in improving conditions for at least one community - Herat, Afghanistan. Nearly two-thirds of the Afghan population is without access to basic health-care facilities. Women and children are especially affected as Afghanistan has one of the word’s highest maternal and child mortality rates. Some studies estimate that an Afghan woman dies giving birth every 30 minutes. In addition, women are often burn victims either at the hands of angry relatives or self-inflicted as a protest against harsh circumstances. The 400-bed Herat Hospital is the only non-military hospital in this entire province in Western Afghanistan. Supply needs are critical for the Burn Unit where cream, bandages and IV saline are the only solace available for patients, some of whom are tragic victims of the difficult intentional burnings. Your support of this project will enable SoA to contribute critical supplies to the Herat Burn Center, Gozahra Clinic and similiar facilities throughout Western Afghanistan. In addition to the items listed above which SoA will provide with your help, we will partner with Orchard International in shipping an ocean container of supplies donated specifically for Herat Hospital including incubators, baby warmers, and vitamins.
A very sparse Delivery Room in Herat You can visit our project page to learn more. PLEASE ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO JOIN OUR MAILING LIST Our recent drive for signups to our mailing list only netted about 65 new subscribers. We are hoping that by reaching out to bloggers that we jump start this effort. There’s no risk to pass it on to family and friends, we never share your email address. It’s also very easy for you, at any time, to unsubscribe on our site. Bloggers please contact us if you wish to publish these monthly updates on your blog or volunteer your time in any way. We are looking for a volunteer Web Technology Director, volunteer Administrative staff and volunteer writers. If you would like to post this article on your blog please contact us by clicking on the email link below. We will email you the text and html so you can just copy it into a new post on your blog. Thank you for taking the time to read our project update. The War on Terror is beginning to pick up steam and our country has finally been able to get out the word due to the contributions of the blogger community. Bloggers like Michael Yon, Bill Roggio and Michael Totten are bringing America’s side of the story directly to the people. In the past when we won important victories like the capture of Saddam Hussein, the conclusion of successful elections, the recapture of Fallujah and many others - the significance was lost on the general public because of the lack of awareness about what is really going on. That ignorance has led some Americans to remain unaware that our troops do more than just kill the enemy. They spend much of their time building relationships with Iraqi communities, assisting them to defend themselves, coordinating reconstruction projects and distributing humanitarian aid. Now that we have found our voice it is time to step up our efforts. The blogger community has done a great job so lets keep up the good work. We have a long way to go. Email Us All the best, The Spirit of America Team http://www.spiritofamerica.net/


Powered by Qumana


Monday, July 30, 2007

Friendly fire and conspiracy theories

The reason I am writing on this subject is because some time ago I got an e-mail on this subject from from somebody I respect.  Thus, although normally I would not dignify any conspiracy theory with an answer, in this case I felt that I needed to respond.


Friendly fire happens in wars.  The Wikipedia article I link to lists numerous examples of friendly fire incidents throughout history.  The most well known recent incidents are the accidental killing of 4 Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan and the death of Pat Tillman.  It is always sad and tragic.  In some instances friendly fire happened between future foes.  For example, the highest-scoring Allied Ace Ivan Kozhedub is officially credited with 62 aerial kills.  Yet his real score is 64.  His 2 additional kills are American P-51 Mustangs.  Apparently late in the war, while on a fighter sweep mission, he spotted a formation of American B-17 Flying Fortresses under attack by German fighters.  He went in to lend a hand to the Allies and opened fire on the Germans.  The Germans retreated, but Kozhedub found himself under attack by P-51 Mustangs escorting the bombers.  Why?  You see, Kozhedub flew Lavochkin La-7 fighter, which could be easily mistaken for the German Focke-Wulf FW-190.  Look at the pictures for yourself:


Lavochkin La-7


Fig. 1.  Kozhedub's Lavochkin La-7.



Fig. 2. Focke-Wulf FW-190-A8.  Spring of 1945.


In heat of battle it is pretty easy to mistake one of these aircraft for another.  And if you have ever flown any Combat Flight simulator, you know that it is almost impossible to see the markings.  Mustang was slightly faster than La-7, so the only way for Kozhedub to avoid being shot down by the unrelenting Mustangs was to shoot the Mustangs down.  Unfortunately one of the Mustang pilots was killed.  But the other managed to bail out and land in the area of Kozhedub's airfield.  When Kozhedub landed, he thought he was in huge trouble, but lucky for him, when the American pilot was asked who shot him down, he replied that he was shot down by a Focke-Wulf with a red nose.  Thus, the incident was hushed up.


Sometimes friendly fire occurs when a party not participating in the conflict tries to gather intelligence on both sides.  American Wayne Peake shot down an RAF Mosquito, while flying for Israeli Air Force during Israel's War for Independence.  The Mosquito was flying from Iraq.  Aparently the British denied that they were flying there.  So, an assumption that it was a hostile aircraft was very reasonable.  There was another incident, also described here, when RAF Spitfires went down to the ground to look at the Israeli convoy just strafed by Egyptian Spitfires which fled the area.  Needless to say, they were immediately engaged by the IAF, also flying Spitfires.  3 or 4 RAF pilots were shot down.


What all these incidents have in common is the fact that they are all regarded for what they are: unfortunate and tragic accidents that often happen in wars.  There is however one such incident that is surrounded by conspiracy theories that even now, 40 years later would not go away.  I am talking about the USS Liberty incident.  Anti-Semites on the Left and on the Right are eager to scream about deliberate Israeli attack.  For the Left this incident also presents a rare opportunity to be on the side of American military, just like the story of SS St. Louis gives them a chance to defend the Jews.  In the case of SS St. Louis they get to defend the Jews, while blaming America.  In the case of USS Liberty they get to defend American military, while blaming Israel.   The incident was investigated in both countries.  But it does not matter: the conspiracy lives on.  Just like with 9/11 conspiracy theories, there people who believe that huge numbers of people in both countries are in on it.  There are even people who actually justify a deliberate attack by Israeli forces on USS Liberty, as described on this conspiratorial site.  Here the proponents of the conspiracy theory use a straw man argument, saying that those who justify the attack claim that USS Liberty was spying on Israel, and then go on to say that there were no Hebrew linguists on board, but only Arabic and Russian linguists.  Yet then they go on to quote one of the survivors saying: "We heard their (Israeli pilots - Eric-Odessit) communications".  So, which is it?  The last time Israeli pilots communicated in English was during the War for Independence, when they all were American, Canadian and other British Commonwealth nationals.  And those who were born in Israel, like Modi Alon and Ezer Weitzman, were RAF veterans.  But in 1967 the language used by IAF was Hebrew.  So, whatever survivors of the attack might have heard, they could not understand.  In June NSA released the declassified intercepts of Israeli helicopter pilots participating in the rescue efforts.  Here are the links to those transcripts in English:


Labeled 104, dated 8 June 1967, 1229Z-1244Z;


Labeled 105, dated 8 June 1967, 1247Z-1319Z;


Labeled 130, dated 8 June 1967, 1307Z-1311Z.


It is very clear that the helicopter pilots and their commanders did not know who the ship belonged to, although by that time they were already worried that a tragedy had occurred.  The fact that there are no intercepts prior to the rescue efforts suggests that indeed there were no Hebrew linguists on board, and Liberty was not spying on Israel.  So, what the hell did the survivors hear?  Read the rest of the NSA document dump.  Apparently, USS Liberty was ordered out of the area, but somehow did not get the message.  Yet, the Israelis were assured that there were no friendlies in the area.  Now put yourself in the place of Israeli commanders.  You are assured that the only ships in the area are hostiles.  You know that your enemies are not shy about using illegal tricks, like flying false colors.  You would order an attack even if if you did see the friendly flag.  In fact, I suspect the ship would have been attacked even if it was flying an Israeli flag.  And by the way, if you have a combat flight simulator (any of them), try attacking a ship in it.  By the time you the flag, you'll be crashing into the ship.


On the other hand, what would be the motivation for Israel to attack an American ship?  The conspiratorial site I linked to, as well as other sites like that one, mention some tactical reasons for it.  But again, put yourself in the position of Israeli leaders at the time.  Your tiny country is surrounded by enemies.  The country that was your sole supplier of sophisticated weapons, like aircraft, just decided that they would be better off if they were friends with the Arabs.  Yes, that was France.  They even used your preventive strike on your enemies preparing to attack as an excuse to stop the shipment of Mirage fighter that you had already paid for.  Out of 2 world superpowers, one - the Soviet Union - is openly hostile and supports your enemies bent on your annihilation.  The other superpower - the USA - is somewhat friendly.  You would hope to cultivate that friendship, and you have a good chance to do just that, since the rival superpower happens to support your enemies.  Why would you risk alienating America and blow your chance for American support, even if you think that an American ship is spying on you?  Les Kinsolving of World Net Daily wrote a couple of articles on the subject.  In one he wrote:



...the theory that Israel, during the Six Day War in 1967, would have deliberately attacked the U.S.S. Liberty is utterly preposterous.


It is as preposterous as the idea that Capt. John Paul Jones would have been ordered by Gen. George Washington to sink the French troop ships bringing soldiers and artillery to help us win our war of independence. (emphasis mine - Eric-Odessit)



This is exactly my thought.


Powered by Qumana


Tuesday, July 3, 2007

Tony Blair's last interview as a PM

Actually, I am not 100% sure that it is his last interview as a Prime Minister.  But it is close to it, and very relevant (via LGF):





Blair here is very eloquent and pretty blunt.  He also threw out political correctness, perhaps because he does not care any more.


Powered by Qumana


A disturbing story

Well, this disturbing story was first posted by Debbie Schlussel in May, but I have just discovered it, thanks to Pamela of Atlas Shrugs.  In light of the latest plot by some jihadi doctors I think it is very relevant:



...On December 1, 2003, Joe Applebaum was admitted to Rush North Shore Medical Center, a major hospital in Chicago. He was stricken with an acute (or distended) abdomen--a swelling of the stomach that is easily diagnosed and treated. But it was never treated by anyone at the hospital. For 12 hours, Joe Applebaum was left alone--left to die, which he did the next day.


A Jewish man, he was identified as a Jew on the front page of his medical chart. The chief resident doctor assigned to treat Mr. Applebaum, Osama Ahmed Ibrahim, MD, sure noticed the religious notation on Applebaum's chart. And it appears that this is why he never once checked or examined this emergency patient, Mr. Applebaum, and left him to die. When another doctor at the hospital finally examined Mr. Applebaum--not his assigned doctor, Dr. Ibrahim, he told Applebaum's son, Michael, to say good-bye to his father because he was about to die.


Dr. Ibrahim, is a Muslim from Birmingham, England--a hotbed of Islamic radicalism and terror planning. It is breeding ground for anti-Semitic hate. He is a graduate of Ain Shams University Medical School in Egypt. This extremist school featured on its faculty the father of Al-Qaeda mastermind and number two, Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri. There Zawahiri was a Muslim Brotherhood activist.



As usual, I recommend reading the whole thing.


Powered by Qumana


Sunday, July 1, 2007

Disappointment

I supported the Bush administration.  Although Bush wasn't my first choice in 2000 (I voted for McCain, which might have been a mistake anyway), I voted for him with enthusiasm in 2004.  After all, his opponent was worthless and dishonest political opportunist.  But Bush keeps failing me and people like me.  The latest example is this:



At Wednesday’s rededication ceremony of the Saudi-funded Islamic Center of Washington, D.C., President Bush missed a perfect opportunity to repudiate apologism for radical Islam, and instead announced his latest plan to get the Muslim world to stop hating America: appoint a special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).


Bush praised the OIC, saying, “We admire and thank those Muslims who have denounced what the Secretary General of the OIC called ‘radical fringe elements who pretend that they act in the name of Islam.’” The special envoy’s mission, Bush said, would be to “listen and learn” to OIC ambassadors.

While this may sound nice, it is rooted in complete ignorance of the rampant radicalism, pro-terrorist, and anti-American sentiments routinely found in statements by the OIC and its leaders, including referring to “Islamophobia” — and not the mass slaughter of innocents in the name of Islam — the “worst form of terrorism,” as OIC did last May.



Do read it all.  It looks like, while Bush is willing to fight to some extend, his heart is really in appeasement.  And that is how he might be remembered by history.  There was another leader in history who did go to war when he was backed against the wall, but whose name is forever associated with appeasement.  His name was Neville Chamberlain.


Powered by Qumana


History is important

Here is an interesting article, thanks to Pamela, a. k. a. Atlas:



After their military defeat by regular forces, the occupied population produced terrorists who engaged in bombings, sniping, poisonings, and other attacks on occupation forces and on the civilian population. They operated as irregulars in small terror units, armed with automatic weapons and bazookas.


Women and minors as young as eight participated in the terror attacks. They attempted to build weapons of mass destruction, using chemical poisons. They assassinated officials of the occupation regime. They had a special obsession with torturing and murdering "collaborators." They murdered hundreds of civilians, while thousands of the terrorists themselves were killed by the occupation armed forces. The occupiers responded to terror with brutality and force, sometimes using collective punishment.

The above does notrefer to or describe the anti-American and anti-British terror in Iraq and Afghanistan. Nor does it describe Palestinian terrorism against Israel launched from the West Bank and Gaza.

What it does refer to is the campaign of terrorism directed against Allied forces in Europe in the aftermath of the defeat of Nazi Germany. The terrorists were members of a number of underground "resistance" organizations attempting to punish the Allied "occupiers" and drive them out. The most important of the terror groups was known as Werwolf (German for werewolf).



A while ago there was an episode on the History Channel about Werwolves in Germany.  I can't find a link to that particular episode now, but I did watch it.  The Nazis kept up their resistance well into 1948.  So, the comparison is definitely valid.


Powered by Qumana


Go, Rudy!

I have already expressed on this blog my support for Rudy Giuliani's candidacy for President in 2008.  I believe he is the kind of leader we need in order to win the war we are in right now.  Here is the link to Rudy's "contract with America", explained in details:



1. I will keep America on offense in the Terrorists’ War on Us.


…………………………………………………………………………….


2. I will end illegal immigration, secure our borders and identify every non-citizen in our nation.


…………………………………………………………………………….


3. I will restore fiscal discipline and cut wasteful Washington spending.


…………………………………………………………………………….


4. I will cut taxes and reform the tax code.


…………………………………………………………………………….


5. I will impose accountability on Washington.


…………………………………………………………………………….


6. I will lead America towards energy independence.


…………………………………………………………………………….


7. I will give Americans more control over their health care with affordable and portable free-market solutions.


…………………………………………………………………………….


8. I will increase adoptions, decrease abortions, and protect the quality of life for our children.


…………………………………………………………………………….


9. I will reform the legal system and appoint strict constructionist judges.


…………………………………………………………………………….


10. I will ensure that every community in America is prepared for terrorist attacks and natural disasters.


…………………………………………………………………………….


11. I will provide access to a quality education to every child in America by giving real school choice to parents.


…………………………………………………………………………….


12. I will expand America's involvement in the global economy and strengthen our reputation around the world.



Obviously, read the whole article for details.


Powered by Qumana


Quick links 7-2-07

Again, in the interest of saving time, here are the links that I find important, but think it's OK to lump them together:


Winds of War
Iran is making a mistake that may lead the Middle East into a broader conflict.

BY JOSHUA MURAVCHIK
Monday, June 25, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT



Several conflicts of various intensities are raging in the Middle East. But a bigger war, involving more states--Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, the Palestinian Authority and perhaps the United States and others--is growing more likely every day, beckoned by the sense that America and Israel are in retreat and that radical Islam is ascending.


…………………………………………………………………………….


A large portion of modern wars erupted because aggressive tyrannies believed that their democratic opponents were soft and weak. Often democracies have fed such beliefs by their own flaccid behavior. Hitler's contempt for America, stoked by the policy of appeasement, is a familiar story. But there are many others. North Korea invaded South Korea after Secretary of State Dean Acheson declared that Korea lay beyond our "defense perimeter." Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait after our ambassador assured him that America does not intervene in quarrels among Arabs. Imperial Germany launched World War I, encouraged by Great Britain's open reluctance to get involved. Nasser brought on the 1967 Six Day War, thinking that he could extort some concessions from Israel by rattling his sword.



Gaza’s Fall
The splitting of Palestine into two entities is clarifying.

By Charles Krauthammer



Gaza is now run not by a conventional political party, but by a movement that is revolutionary, Islamist, and terrorist. Worse, Hamas is a client of Iran. Gaza now constitutes the farthest reach of the archipelago of Iranian proxies: Hamas in Palestine, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Mahdi army (among others) in Iraq, and the Alawite regime of Syria.

This Islamist mini-replica of the Comintern is at war not just with Israel, but with the moderate Arab states, who finally woke up to this threat last summer when they denounced Hezbollah for provoking the Lebanon war with Israel. The fall of Gaza is particularly terrifying to Egypt because Hamas is so closely affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, the chief Islamist threat to the secular-nationalist regime that has ruled Egypt since the revolution of 1952. Which is why Egypt has just invited Israeli, Jordanian, and moderate Palestinian leaders to a summit next week — pointedly excluding and isolating Hamas.

The splitting of Palestine into two entities is nonetheless clarifying. Since Hamas won the parliamentary elections of January 2006, we’ve had to deal with the fiction of a supposedly unified Palestine ruled by an avowedly “unity” government of Fatah and Hamas. Now the muddle has undergone political hydrolysis, separating out the relatively pure elements: a Hamas-ruled Gaza and Fatah-ruled (for now) West Bank.



Two Palestines, Anyone?
By Daniel Pipes
FrontPageMagazine.com | June 20, 2007



The Hamas victory over Fatah in Gaza on June 14 has great importance for Palestinians, for the Islamist movement, and for the United States. It has rather less significance for Israel.


Tensions between Fatah and Hamas are likely to endure and with them, the split between the West Bank and Gaza. The emergence of two rival entities, "Hamastan" and "Fatahland," culminates a long-submerged conflict; noting the two regions' fissiparous tendencies in 2001, Jonathan Schanzer predicted it "would not be all that surprising" were the Palestinian Authority (PA) to divide geographically. Subsequent events did indeed pulled them apart:





  • The anarchy that began in early 2004 spewed forth Palestinian clan chieftains and criminal warlords.

  • Yasir Arafat's death in November 2004 removed the transcendentally evil figure who alone could bridge the two regions.

  • Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in mid-2005 deprived Gaza of its one stabilizing element.

  • Hamas's victory in the PA elections of January 2006 provided a strong base from which to challenge Fatah.



Former Soviet Dissident Warns For EU Dictatorship




Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.


Mr Bukovsky paid a visit to the European Parliament on Thursday at the invitation of Fidesz, the Hungarian Civic Forum. Fidesz, a member of the European Christian Democrat group, had invited the former Soviet dissident over from England, where he lives, on the occasion of this year’s 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Uprising. After his morning meeting with the Hungarians, Mr Bukovsky gave an afternoon speech in a Polish restaurant in the Trier straat, opposite the European Parliament, where he spoke at the invitation of the United Kingdom Independence Party, of which he is a patron.



Powered by Qumana


Saturday, June 23, 2007

I know, it's been over 2 weeks...

...since the D-Day anniversary, but I got around to posting these videos from Youtube only now.  Just reflect on what had to be done in order to defeat Nazism.  This is the Omaha Beach landing scene from "Saving Private Ryan", separated into 4 clips.  They go in sequence.


Clip 1:





Clip 2:





Clip 3:





Clip 4:





Powered by Qumana


Thursday, June 14, 2007

Modern Media reporting on D-Day

When last week I attempted to describe how the Modern Media would report the Normandy Landing on June 6, 1944, I was not the only one thinking along these lines (via Michelle Malkin):





Powered by Qumana


Wednesday, June 6, 2007

Three Anniversaries in a row

The moth of June has 3 anniversaries in a row.


1. June 4, 65 years ago (thanks to Old War Dogs):



65 years ago today, the war in the Pacific reached its turning point.


Less than seven months after Pearl Harbor, the Empire of Japan was planning another attack. This time, it was our outpost on tiny Midway Atoll. The plan was to take this foothold and threaten an invasion of Hawaii. Further, they hoped to lure the remnants of the US Fleet into a decisive, final battle and secure their holdings.


Unfortunately, the Navy was reading the Japanese code, and we knew their plans.


We were outnumbered across the board. They had four carriers and several battleships sailing for Midway -- and all the carriers veterans of Pearl Harbor. We had two in good shape, and a third -- the Yorktown -- in need of three months of repair after being mauled at the Battle of the Coral Sea.



Read it all.  One commenter to this article wondered how the modern media would report this.  The author had the answer readily available:



US SUFFERS MAJOR DEFEAT IN PACIFIC


Key Island Falls To Japan


June 14, 1942


(Honolulu) -- In a series of stunning moves, the Japanese have scored two bold victories against the United States -- and inflicted grave damage on the already-battered American fleet.


Anonymous sources within the Navy have confirmed reports that the Japanese have invaded and occupied two islands off the coast of Alaska and the strategically-critical atoll of Midway, about 1300 miles northwest of Honolulu.


The Japanese struck with complete surprise, the Japanese attacked US bases in the Aleutian Islands on June 3. They followed up by invading and occupying two of the islands, Attu and Kiska.


Then, on June 4, the main blow fell.


Planes from at least three and as many as five aircraft carriers attacked the two islands that make up Midway Atoll, savaging the base's defenders, who were equipped with obsolete fighters and ill-suited medium bombers. The defenders fought valiantly, but like the Marines abandoned by the government on Wake Island last December, were unable to fight off the Japanese. By June 7, the atoll was firmly in Japanese hands.



This is funny and very sad.


2. June 5, 40 years ago (thanks to Old War Dogs):


The Six Day War in real time



This June marks the 40th Anniversary of the Six Day War, a war that shaped Israel’s current geography and that continues to have a profound impact on the Middle East to this day.  Last year, I got hold of a copy of a 1967 Life Magazine that was rushed into press immediately after the War.  The collected articles in that magazine make fascinating reading because (1) they position Israel as David to the Arab Goliath, (2) they recognize that Israel has always been a proxy fighter (then, in the Cold War; now, in the Jihadist War against the West), and (3) they predict the coming refugee problem.  I’m consolidating three old posts for this one new one, so long-time readers will recognize a lot of this.  Familiarity shouldn't breed contempt for this content, though, because it’s very interesting stuff, both as contemporaneous news, and as a snapshot of reporting that enables us to understand how the American media has changed.



Bookwarm's essay is excellent.  Read it all.


3. June 6, 63 years ago.


If the date "June 6, 1944" does not immediately jump at you, go see Steven Spielberg's "Saving Private Ryan".  When you watch it, pay close attention to the opening scenes depicting the landing on Omaha Beach.  Here I am going to attempt to guess reporting of the Normandy landings by the modern media:



New York Times, June 6, 1944, Late Edition:


Yesterday we reported about planned invasion of Normandy being postponed by one day due to weather concerns.  Finally, in order to save himself from embarrassment, General Eisenhower gave the go-ahead, even though the weather was not any better today.  Now, several hours and over 2000 casualties later, American GIs are still stuck on the beach code-named "Omaha".  Our intelligence failure was obvious: the German resistance to such an extent was not anticipated.  Congressman Don Kurtha, himself a veteran of the Great War, suggested that our troops should be re-deployed to Iceland, where they will be safe.  "We needlessly and illegally got ourselves into a war between the French and the Germans", - said Congressman Kurtha.  German Field Marshal Rommel said that if he had free hand in moving the armored forces, he would be able to crash the invasion.  Unfortunately for him, German Chancellor Mr. Hitler still mistakenly believes that the main invasion will come at Pas de Calais.  Our anonymous sources at the War Department suggested that if General Patton was given command of a real army instead of elaborate deception and really invaded at Pas de Calais, the invasion might have succeeded.  As it is, it is likely to fail.


In related news, BBC correspondent Allen Jackson arrived to France a few days earlier and attempted to interview the German defenders.  We haven't heard from him for a couple of days.  He since made a radio broadcast.  It turns out, the Gestapo detained him.  He said that his captors treat him well and this whole mess of a war is really British and American fault.  All Mr. Hitler wanted to do was to re-unite ethnic German populations of Europe into a great German state.  Parts of ancient German territories were illegally occupied by countries like Czechoslovakia and Poland.  As for the alleged persecution of the Jews, this is simply Jewish propaganda, and besides, Jews have only themselves to blame for the harsh treatment.



I can play with this for a while, but you get my point.  It would be funny, if it wasn't so sad.



Powered by Qumana


Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Quick links

Severe lack of time makes me do these quick links posts, which is not a bad way to keep the blog moving under the circumstances.  Here are 2 links that I consider important:


LGF: Syrian MP Confirms: Syria Arming for War

A member of the Syrian parliament has confirmed to Al Jazeera TV that Syria is arming its military to fight a war with Israel, expected to break out this summer.





A member of the Syrian parliament, Muhammad Habash, confirmed on Tuesday that his country was actively preparing for war with Israel, expected to break out in the summer, Israel Radio reported.


In an interview with Al Jazeera, Habash said it was no secret that the Syrian military was arming itself for the upcoming confrontation with the IDF.


He also claimed that the Israeli government was the one that wanted the war so that it could survive politically.





But wait — I thought Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said Bashar Assad was ready to resume the peace process?



Atlas Shrugs: Post-Bush Bush



Color me disenchanted. At the most critical juncture in American history, we had it all (the White House, Senate and House) and we squandered it on goodwill to snakes (Democraps) and savages (Islam.) There is no excuse for the utter abandonment of the Bush Doctrine or  Bush's complete capitulation to neo State Arabist mentality. He has moved the bar so low that anyone one center or right of him is labeled a right wing extremist. There is no difference between him and the Dhimmicrats.


Caroline Glick in today's Jerusalem Post nails it:



ECHOES OF 1919


Both critics and supporters of US President George W. Bush's post-September 11 vision of a new, freedom-loving Middle East have noted the strong similarities between the president and his predecessor Woodrow Wilson.




Read the whole thing.


Powered by Qumana


Monday, May 28, 2007

Memorial Day

Today is Memorial Day, the holiday created for reflection and remembrance of those who fought and died for our freedoms.  It is not an empty rhetoric for me.  In my mind this holiday is also closely associated with the Victory Day, the only Soviet holiday I respect to this day.  Since I am Jewish, this day signifies the survival of my family.  Both of my grandfathers fought in the Soviet Army during World War 2.  So, I always try to visit my grandpa's grave here in San Diego some time in May.  Media tends not to report on heroic deeds of our soldiers in the current war.  But I got this link via Republican Jewish Coalition newsletter:



...This lack of reported stories of heroism on the part of America’s fighting men and women is not due to a lack of media access to the military. On the contrary, Operation Iraqi Freedom has begun a new era of access for journalists with the advent of the Department of Defense’s media-embed program. Nor has the lack of relevant reportage been due to a deficiency in individual gallantry displayed by our soldiers on the field of battle; there have been numerous cases of exceptional courage under fire to this point in the War on Terror, and there will doubtless be many more before this conflict has drawn to a close.

Every man and woman fighting for America deserves respect and acknowledgment. There are some, though, who go above and beyond even the bravery and valor shown by the “average” soldier, sailor, airman, or marine who puts his or her life on the line, day in and day out, in defense of America and in pursuit of the nation’s goals. Here is a selection of four exceptional warriors — one from each branch of service — whose names and deeds every American should know. Each of these men is a true hero in every sense of the word, having fought in defense of America and having made the ultimate sacrifice for his mission and for his fellow men.


Michael Monsoor, United States Navy
Michael Monsoor of Garden Grove, California, felt the same call to serve his country that had led his father and brother into the Marine Corps. He was pulled in a different direction from his family members, though — he was drawn to the U.S. Navy, not out of a desire to serve in the fleet, but out of a burning ambition to serve as a Navy SEAL, one of America’s special-operations elites.


…………………………………………………………………………….


Jason Dunham, United States Marine Corps
Jason Dunham, of Scio, New York, shared a birthday (the day before Veteran’s Day) with the United States Marine Corps. A Corporal in the Corps, he was killed in Iraq in 2004, at the age of 23. Had Dunham not given his life for his comrades three years ago, he would have turned 25 last fall on the day that the USMC, which has been fortunate beyond measure to have contained men of Dunham’s quality for over two centuries, turned 231.


…………………………………………………………………………….


Ross McGinnis, United States Army
When most young men are turning 17, they are thinking about their upcoming senior year of high school, their sports career, or their choice of college. When Ross McGinnis, of Knox, Pennsylvania, turned 17, he marched down to the recruiter’s office and joined the Army via the delayed enlistment program.


…………………………………………………………………………….


Jason Cunningham, United States Air Force
Jason Cunningham of Carlsbad, New Mexico, joined the U.S. Navy at the age of 19, but he didn’t stay long. After just under four years in the fleet, Cunningham decided on a radical career change, setting his sights on joining an elite Air Force fraternity known as Pararescuemen. The USAF has fewer than 1,000 of these medical professionals whose job is to deploy by any means necessary — sea, air, or land — to rescue downed aircrew members and injured special operators.


…………………………………………………………………………….


No Greater Love…
These four men exemplify a mindset that is both incomprehensible and unimaginable to all who have not been in such a situation. When faced with a life or death situation, with an escape route both simple and available, every one of them chose death, against every instinct of self-preservation. And, in doing so, they allowed the men with them, marked for death, to keep their lives.



Do read the whole thing.


Powered by Qumana


Importance of Military History

I got this article via Republican Jewish Coalition newsletter.  In it Rich Lowry writes this week the importance of military history and how it's vanishing from academia today.  I am not going to excerpt anything from this article because the publishers require people to ask permission for it.  But just go and read it.


Powered by Qumana